- Election Commission stated it was aggrieved with media reviews
- Reports have “tarnished the image”, the Election Commission stated
- India has seen a daunting surge in Covid circumstances in the previous couple of weeks
The Election Commission right this moment requested the Madras High Court to restrain the media from reporting on oral observations, days after the courtroom’s sharp remarks on “murder charges” on officers of the election physique for not stopping political rallies.
It additionally argued that there was “nothing to suggest” that campaigning was a major consider driving any Covid spike in states that had been voted versus people who did not.
In its petition, the Election Commission stated it was aggrieved with media reviews of the Madras High Court’s oral observations that it’s “singularly responsible for the situation prevalent today” and that the Election Commission ought to face homicide expenses.
“These reports have tarnished the image of the Election Commission of India as an independent constitutional agency that is entrusted with the constitutional responsibility of conducting elections,” stated the ballot physique.
It additionally stated a police criticism had been filed in opposition to the Deputy Election Commissioner accusing him of homicide in West Bengal after the media reported on the observations.
On Monday, throughout arguments, the Madras High Court had commented: “Your institution is singularly responsible for the second wave of COVID-19. Your officers should be booked on murder charges probably…Were you on another planet when the election rallies were held?”
The stinging rebuke was not a part of the courtroom’s order later that day, which stated: “At no cost can counting become a catalyst for a further surge.”
The Election Commission argued right this moment: “No one must be permitted to report on the proceedings of this court that are not borne out by the record, especially when the detailed order is made available. There was no occasion for this court to make such observations since the campaigning in Tamil Nadu ended back in April 4.”
It additionally stated the Calcutta and Kerala High Courts have “expressed satisfaction” with the Covid-related measures taken by the Election Commission for relying on Sunday. The variety of Covid circumstances was comparatively low when elections had been introduced in Kerala, West Bengal, Assam, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry on February 26, the fee stated.
The comparability of information between the states that voted and people who did not through the marketing campaign interval between March 20 and April 4 “does not indicate that the election campaigns were a significant factor, much less than what the court termed as a singular factor”, the Election Commission advised the courtroom.
Also, it stated no elections had been held in states with the best variety of circumstances – Maharashtra Karnataka Uttar Pradesh and Delhi.
“It therefore cannot be said that the Election Commission is ‘singularly responsible for the second wave of Covid-19’ nor the officers of the Election Commission can be said to be any manner culpable for ‘murder’,” the Election Commission’s petition stated.
#Courts #Booked #Murder #Remark #Election #Commission #Pushes